That is an version of The Atlantic Day by day, a e-newsletter that guides you thru the most important tales of the day, helps you uncover new concepts, and recommends the perfect in tradition. Join it right here.

Final evening, Jimmy Kimmel presided over a surprisingly regular Academy Awards present. This system ran easily with no true upsets. Oppenheimer took residence a predicted haul, Ryan Gosling introduced down the home together with his efficiency of Barbie’s “I’m Simply Ken,” and Kimmel made some largely good-natured ribs about his fellow stars within the room. I spoke with my colleague Shirley Li, who covers Hollywood, about why internet hosting is a troublesome job, how Kimmel pulled it off, and what objective the Oscars serve in 2024.

First, listed below are three new tales from The Atlantic:


Regular and Earnest

Lora Kelley: You’ve written about how internet hosting an awards present generally is a fairly thankless job. What makes the duty so exhausting?

Shirley Li: The folks within the room at these Hollywood awards exhibits are highly effective: They’re A-list celebrities and the individuals who will green-light the following movies. A bunch is meant to be entertaining them but in addition making mild ribs, as a result of that’s what they need.

On the identical time, a number is attempting to attraction to the fully totally different viewers of shoppers tuning in from residence. The host has to take action a lot glad-handing whereas additionally taking all of the blame in the event that they don’t hold issues transferring. It’s quite a lot of consideration paid to at least one one that, on the finish of the evening, doesn’t ever stroll away with a trophy.

Lora: So why do folks comply with do it?

Shirley: The publicity to Hollywood’s energy gamers is large, and it’s a uncommon alternative for lots of comics. They might really feel that the publicity outweighs the strain—although, as somebody who has watched quite a lot of awards exhibits through the years and seen how a lot blame will get foisted upon these hosts, I believe the strain outweighs the publicity. I’m not shocked the Oscars turned to somebody who had hosted a number of instances earlier than.

Lora: How do you assume Jimmy Kimmel did final evening?

Shirley: He was a stable host. His monologue was punchier than the earlier 3 times he’s hosted. I believed the way in which that he ended the monologue, by mentioning the crew members backstage whereas additionally speaking about final 12 months’s Hollywood strikes, was a wise transfer. He did job of constructing jokes that appealed to the folks within the room whereas additionally reminding the viewers at residence about why what’s occurring in Hollywood issues.

Kimmel is extra of a late-night host than a stand-up comedian. He has some wiggle room: He’s mates with the folks within the viewers; they’re inclined to applaud him and go together with bits, even when they’re a little bit on the insulting facet. I used to be sort of shocked that he made a joke about Robert Downey Jr.’s previous substance abuse. However Downey appeared prepared to play alongside; they’ve identified one another lengthy sufficient that Kimmel was in a position to get some laughs and hold issues transferring. Kimmel can be somebody who is understood to folks at residence. There was—I hate to place it this manner—quite a lot of Kimmel-core. You in all probability loved that in case you have watched his present, or have been uncovered to his work prior to now.

Lora: Who has been, in your thoughts, the best host? The author Fran Hoepfner wrote on our web site over the weekend that Billy Crystal is her ultimate. Who’s your Billy Crystal?

Shirley: Billy Crystal is my Billy Crystal too. I like that piece as a result of the author and I are the identical technology. Crystal is the Oscars host I grew up with. It’s sort of like my view on Saturday Night time Stay: The solid that you simply grew up watching is your favourite solid of all time.

Crystal was a improbable host as a result of he appealed to the folks within the room but in addition made issues actually digestible for folks watching at residence. Whoopi Goldberg was a improbable host, too, as a result of she could possibly be self-effacing whereas additionally ribbing the movies themselves. I keep in mind seeing quite a lot of film stars laughing together with her. She had a approach of constructing jokes in regards to the movies being feted that didn’t make anyone within the room uncomfortable.

Lora: Have been there any surprises final evening? What massive moments stood out?

Shirley: This has been an extended awards season. There are such a lot of extra awards exhibits than there must be. So, going into the night, I believe folks may fairly simply predict who was going to win.

Emma Stone’s win for Greatest Actress, for Poor Issues, could possibly be thought-about a shock, although she and Lily Gladstone, who starred in Killers of the Flower Moon, have been neck and neck all through awards season. The consensus was that it could seemingly be Emma or Lily. Nonetheless, Stone did appear flabbergasted, as my colleague David Sims put it in his recap of the night. It was a light shock that Poor Issues received the identical quantity of affection within the manufacturing classes as Oppenheimer—although Oppenheimer nonetheless took residence seven Oscars.

It was a well-run, well-produced present. That’s truly sort of shocking given all of the surprising moments on the Oscars within the earlier decade. No person slapped anyone. At this level you anticipate one thing to go flawed, and nothing actually went flawed.

Final evening, the present introduced again, for the primary time since 2009, the format of earlier class winners monologuing in regards to the classes’ nominees. I personally love that format as a result of it’s heartfelt, and it’s earnest.

Individuals typically ask: What’s the purpose of honoring and being so lovey-dovey about filmmaking, of watching these A-listers clap each other on the again? In our social-media age, we are inclined to need issues to be ironic and cynical and contrarian. However the Oscars are a reminder that there’s quite a lot of love and creativity that’s put into artwork regardless of how you’re feeling in regards to the nominated films. There’s a lot care put into this work.

Associated:


Right now’s Information

  1. President Joe Biden launched his $7.3 trillion price range proposal for the 2025 fiscal 12 months. Amongst different measures, the price range seeks 12 weeks of paid household and medical go away, common pre-Okay for 4-year-olds, and an enlargement of $35-a-month insulin into the industrial market.
  2. Representatives within the Home will vote this week on a invoice that would result in a nationwide ban of TikTok if the corporate’s Chinese language homeowners don’t divest the app’s U.S. operations.
  3. Housing and City Improvement Secretary Marcia Fudge introduced that she would resign from her Cupboard publish this month, citing a need to spend extra time together with her household.

Night Learn

A peach with a lit wick where the stem would be, like a firecracker.
Illustration by Paul Spella / The Atlantic. Supply: Getty.

Fruit Chaos Is Coming

By Zoë Schlanger

Summer season, to me, is all about stone fruit: dark-purple plums, peaches you may odor from three toes away. However final summer time, I struggled to seek out peaches on the farmers’ markets in New York Metropolis. A freak deep freeze in February had taken them out throughout New York State and different elements of the Northeast, buds shriveling on the department as temperatures plummeted beneath zero and a brutally chilly, dry wind swept via the area.

The loss was extreme.

Learn the complete article.

Extra From The Atlantic


Tradition Break

Da’Vine Joy Randolph cries as she accepts her Best Supporting Actress Oscar
Patrick T. Fallon / AFP / Getty

Watch. Final evening, Da’Vine Pleasure Randolph gained the Greatest Supporting Actress Oscar. In her acceptance speech, she voiced her hope that she would “get to do that greater than as soon as.”

Learn. David Toomey’s newest e-book, Kingdom of Play, probes a query that has lengthy befuddled scientists: Why do animals play?

Play our each day crossword.


Stephanie Bai contributed to this text.

Discover all of our newsletters right here.

While you purchase a e-book utilizing a hyperlink on this e-newsletter, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *